|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | ![]() |
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 |
|
On the upside, no one’s wondering the whereabouts of her more seasoned counterpart, Michael Caine. Eisenhower was the U.S. president when the Englishman began acting in the mid 1950’s. A lot has happened in the worldoutside of camera’s viewsince Caine stepped before it for the first of his 140-plus TV show and feature film appearances. Not the least of which is the professional fluidness with which he dependably delivers the thespian equivalent of a bases loaded single each time he takes a turn at bat. Akin to multifaceted affecting gems like Gene Hackman and Samuel Jackson, Caine may not always appear in winning productions, but far more often than not, he shines. At 38-years-old, the unmarried Quinn (Moore) works for the London Diamond Corporation in titular city, the global distributor for the world’s diamond supply. In the company’s employ for 15 years, she’s its firstand onlyfemale manager. Quinn has appreciated the risky gender-pioneering investment the firm’s made in her, almost as much as hers in it. Not anymore. Quinn’s been passed over five times in three years for promotions of men obviously less qualified. It’s happened again. Be it only 1960, this upwardly mobile maiden is equipped to move up one way, or another.
When Hobbs tactically pitches his outlandish plan to Ms. Quinn to separate London Diamond from some, and then later the sum, of its inventory, he banks on finding a sympathetic partner. He just might, as Quinn’s one-time loyalty has given way to bitterness. When the crafty Hobbs let’s Quinn in on a not so insignificant little secretthe company plans to terminate her employmentshe realizes her options are indeed finite. If she can’t break through the glass ceiling through conventional hard work, her only remaining resource may be to illicitly cut through it with the London Diamond’s namesakes in hand. Partners primed, the job is on. With the proverbial bases “juiced,” it's now merely a matter of execution. Can Moore and Caine combine to deliver for audiences that which they collusively covet for the picking? Events crystallized, serviceable is a more apt description for Flawless’ sequent maneuvers. The duo’s underhanded machinations comprise the quintessential heist movie formula, replete with a David vs. Goliath match up, corporate sleaziness, and personal motive. (“Just money?nothing important ever is.”) The film production pivots on a couple of impressive points, displaying sparkling facades and phonetics. The supporting cast (Lambert Wilson as Finch, Derren Nesbitt as Sinclair) capably establish the elegance the movie so naturally wants to creategentlemen wearing well-tailored suits (London Diamond is strictly a man’s world), distinguished looking (and ever-present) cigarette useage, and sophisticated sounding English accents. In the latter’s case, Moore’s diluted British enunciation is explained away be subtly pointing out that Quinn is American born. This biographical detail translates into giving Moore authorization to regrettably rob from both accents at her uttered pleasure. British director Michael Radford (The Merchant of Venice, 2004) composes a period piece that’s sufficiently atmospheric. Photographed in smooth looking blues, grays, and browns, the goings on have a regal look. It feels suspiciously like a remake of a film from the era it depicts; granted, it’s not. All the same, it pays homage to the debonair mannerisms of the original Ocean’s Eleven (1960) and The Thomas Crown Affair (1968), and the modern stealthy heist-iness of each film’s respective remake, The Thomas Crown Affair (1999) and Ocean’s Eleven (2001). The risk of the robbery. The reward of getting away with it. Through it all, be it Flawless’ Demi Moore, or in the erstwhile ladylikeness of Angie Dickinson, Faye Dunaway, Julia Roberts, and Rene Russo, one woman’s steely capacity inside a man’s world. Louis Boram
Screen Formats: 1.85:1
|
|
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
©2002, Reel Reviews, All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||